Marriage-Based Green Card Interviews Are Becoming Much Harder
Marriage-Based Green Card Interviews Are Becoming Much Harder
Over the past several months, we have seen a major shift in how USCIS officers are reviewing marriage-based adjustment of status cases inside the United States. Based on the recent USCIS policy memo and what we are seeing in practice, green card interviews are now receiving much higher scrutiny than before.
USCIS officers have already started asking new discretionary-style questions during adjustment interviews, even in cases that previously appeared straightforward. To be honest, discretionary-based adjudication is not new, but it certainly gets more difficult.
Some recent questions applicants have reportedly been asked include:
• Why did you decide to adjust status inside the United States instead of returning to your home country for consular processing?
• What changed in your original plan after entering the United States?
• Why are you unable to return to your home country for consular processing?
• What ties do you currently have in the United States?
• Have you ever overstayed your visa or authorized stay? If so, why?
USCIS officers also appear to be digging much deeper into the applicant’s original intent at the time of entry into the United States.
In particular, officers are closely reviewing whether the applicant may have had preconceived immigrant intent when entering on nonimmigrant visas that do not allow dual intent, especially B-1/B-2 visitor visas, ESTA, and F1.
Officers may closely examine:
• What the applicant was doing before entering the United States
• Communications or immigration discussions before entry
• Relationship history before entry
• Activities shortly after arrival
• Timing of marriage, filing, school withdrawal, employment, or relocation
• Whether the applicant truly intended to comply with the original visa purpose at the time of entry
Even truthful applicants may face significant scrutiny if they are not properly prepared to explain their timeline and circumstances clearly and consistently.
Because of this trend, it may be a good idea to provide supplemental documents and explanations in appropriate cases showing:
• Family and community ties in the United States
• Financial contributions and employment history
• Positive discretionary factors
• How the applicant may contribute to the U.S. economy and society
• Additional equities that may outweigh negative factors, if applicable
It has become significantly more difficult to pass certain green card interviews compared to previous years.
Recently, I have also consulted with several individuals whose green card applications were denied after interview, including cases that initially appeared relatively straightforward.
In the past, not every applicant necessarily needed an attorney present at the interview. There were many situations where I advised clients to attend interviews on their own to help save legal fees when the case appeared clean and well prepared.
However, the current environment appears very different.
I have heard increasing reports of highly scrutinized interviews where applicants appeared without legal representation and officers conducted aggressive questioning, separated couples for Stokes-style interviews, requested withdrawal of the I-130 petition, or issued denials shortly after the interview.
Of course, every case is different, and not every interview will become confrontational. However, applicants should take the current trend very seriously and prepare accordingly.
Today, applicants should assume they need to be fully overprepared for their interview. A single inconsistent statement, poorly explained answer, or misunderstanding during the interview may create serious problems and potentially place the entire green card process at risk.
Proper preparation now matters more than ever.
This includes carefully reviewing immigration history, understanding every form submitted to USCIS, preparing truthful and consistent answers, organizing strong supporting evidence, identifying possible red flags in advance, and practicing difficult interview questions beforehand.
If possible, applicants should also strongly consider bringing an immigration attorney to the interview, especially if there are prior status violations, unauthorized employment, prior visa issues, inconsistent records, or other potential concerns.
Send your inquiry to info@amylawoffice.com.
Disclaimer: This blog post is provided for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Reading this article does not create an attorney-client relationship with Immigration Law Office of Amy Chung, PLLC. Immigration cases vary widely based on individual facts, and you should consult with a qualified immigration attorney regarding your specific situation before making any legal decisions.